Comments on: Bicycling Magazine Gets It WRONG

By: e.n

e.n — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:52:41 +0000

how about we call some bullshit here: if bike routes are already vetted to be bike-safe streets, why not just add sharrows to every bike route?

By: Streetsblog Los Angeles » Cyclists Need More Than Signs to Keep Us Safe

Streetsblog Los Angeles » Cyclists Need More Than Signs to Keep Us Safe — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:12:41 +0000

[...] The 405 Freeway is probably safer than Sepulveda Blvd. [...]

By: greg

greg — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:02:49 +0000

in 2108 the world will end.

By: Alex Thompson

Alex Thompson — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:23:05 +0000

All sarcastic points made herein are mathematically correct.

By: Matt!

Matt! — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:21:22 +0000

Is 2108 mathematically accurate?

By: Alex Thompson

Alex Thompson — Sat, 10 May 2008 07:34:14 +0000

I dream of 7-11! Future Best City = chuckles. I feel like that’s the name of a B-Boy crew . . .

By: Daily Transit Links Roundup | MetroRiderLA

Daily Transit Links Roundup | MetroRiderLA — Fri, 09 May 2008 17:11:44 +0000

[...] Magazine paints a rosy picture of Los Angeles, Westside BikeSIDE sets the story straight. Share ItDiggdel.icio.usFacebookRedditStumbleUpon Email It 2009 • advertisements • [...]

By: Anon

Anon — Fri, 09 May 2008 16:55:30 +0000

I found it funny (and not surprising) that you mentioned 7-11 in your letter. Anyway, I thought the same thing when I first read that article. The title alone was surprising. “Future Best City” is that a joke? Nice job calling them on their absurd article.

By: david p.

david p. — Thu, 08 May 2008 22:17:56 +0000

cogent analysis.